The Federal Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit to challenge the constitutionality of the resolution, which allows elected President of the Bar for more than two sessions, confirming the absence of a constitutional or statutory text prevent it.
The judge said Abdul Sattar Bayrakdar spokesman for the judiciary, "The Court has considered a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the dissolved Revolutionary Command Council resolution No. 180 of 1977, which authorized the re-appointment of a captain and head of the professional association for more than once."
Bayraktar, adding that "the court found through extrapolation of constitutional provisions it did not prevent the election more than once, except as provided for in Article 72 / identified mandate of the president to two terms."
"The Bar Act of 1965 except the other is from the text precludes the election more than once."
Bayraktar noted that "the contested decision Bdsturith still in force on the basis of Article 130 of the Constitution, and it disrupted the provisions of Article 84 of the attorney's law that talked about the inadmissibility of the election of the Captain of more than two."
He stated that "Article VI of the Constitution cited by the plaintiff in the lawsuit states that the peaceful transfer of power and the means to be by popular vote and this does not preclude the election more than once."
Bayraktar and he finished by saying that "The court therefore decided to dismiss the claim for lack of constitutional support for it."
http://www.iraqja.iq/view.3441/
The judge said Abdul Sattar Bayrakdar spokesman for the judiciary, "The Court has considered a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the dissolved Revolutionary Command Council resolution No. 180 of 1977, which authorized the re-appointment of a captain and head of the professional association for more than once."
Bayraktar, adding that "the court found through extrapolation of constitutional provisions it did not prevent the election more than once, except as provided for in Article 72 / identified mandate of the president to two terms."
"The Bar Act of 1965 except the other is from the text precludes the election more than once."
Bayraktar noted that "the contested decision Bdsturith still in force on the basis of Article 130 of the Constitution, and it disrupted the provisions of Article 84 of the attorney's law that talked about the inadmissibility of the election of the Captain of more than two."
He stated that "Article VI of the Constitution cited by the plaintiff in the lawsuit states that the peaceful transfer of power and the means to be by popular vote and this does not preclude the election more than once."
Bayraktar and he finished by saying that "The court therefore decided to dismiss the claim for lack of constitutional support for it."
http://www.iraqja.iq/view.3441/